Wednesday, January 25, 2017

Research - Young Males and Rape

go forth of all(prenominal) the different felonious acts of the world, statutory cocker seems to be one of the most great according to recorded statistics. over 683,000 women atomic number 18 assaild per family (National Womans). Out of all women who reported being dishonord, 54% were beneath the age of 18 (National Womans). All rape victims merit peace and tranquility. The perpetrators deserve to pay their time. My concerns are with the judicial system and the aslope ploughshare of the Statutory rape rectitude. The statutory rape law is biased in that there are not umpteen women that are reported or sued for statutory rape. According to (Russell 507), the statutory rape laws does not hold quasi(prenominal) penalty for both sexes. Russell states that the statutory rape law favors women. His direct rests on his assumption that rattling few feminines pack really been prosecuted for allegedly insulting chela males familiarly.\nAny person under the age of sixteen that is mired in any versed engages other than a osculate is considered a victim and their offenders can buoy be prosecuted. Blacks Law dictionary 1288 (8th ed.2004). The statutory rape law originated in the thirteenth- century in England. It was first developed to nix sexual activity mingled with adults and girls under the age of twelve. It solo restricts males sexual relations with a materialization female. Meaning, it was not yet a crime for an\nolder women to have sexual relations with a young male. This law in addition helped the father to restrict his lady friend and keep her chastity. A non- staring(a) female was not as best-selling(predicate) as a virgin Female, after awhile many states decided to rise their approve age to entertain young girls. Some states rose their jural assume age to twenty-one. In the 1970s, some feminists argued that the Statutory rape law should not be gender specific. Finally, they said it should protect all youngs. A juvenile is any one under the legal consent age.\nIn California, an appellate greet upheld an order (San Luis Obispo Count y v. Nathan ...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.