The Trails And Imprisoment Of Paul

TRIALS AND IMPRISONMENTSaint capital of Minnesota : Freedom In Chains (Name (School (Professor (CourseSaint capital of Minnesota : assay and jailedThe great apostle had created m some(prenominal) enemies among the Jewish community in the res publica of Corinth (Harry Tajra , 1989 . The Jews in the area bought Paul beforehand the roman print proconsul Gallio of Achaia (All somewhat the Journey , 2008 . The charges were , as cited in the Book of Acts , chapter 18 , pens 12-17 , objective Paul before the proconsul of attempting to induce the people to habituate their religion contrary to what is stated in their faithfulness (Tajra , 1989 . still the proconsul a dance step threw out the eccentric , stating that the case does non concern facts rough a criminal offense (Tajra , 1989 . The Jews were charge Paul of violation s associate to the interpretations of their religious statutes , as cited in verse 14-16 of the same volume and chapter (Bible Gateway , 2008The instance of Gallio dismissing the case could be pictured as Gallio speaking at such a rapid pace that it did not afford the apostle any see to make his defense , or apologia , which was considered an integral weaken of the jurisprudence in Roman law (Tajra , 1989 . The objections raised as to the portrayal of the disaster involving Paul and Gallio are not well-grounded (Rainer Reisner , 1998 . The procedure tail be deduced to what is called cognitio extra ordinem , affording the governor the justly to accept any new charges to accepted and tried before him (Reisner , 1998The DefenseTertullus , the counsel bought by the High Priest Ananias , was called to expound on the case against the apostle (Acts 24 :1-2 (Bible Gateway 2008 . The charges accused Paul of inciting a dissension among the Israelites , and desecration of the temple ( v .5-6 (Bible Gateway , 2008 The charges in ! burden were a shame hodge podge of political and religious offenses , mixed in a sort of enigmatic fashion (Tajra 1989 .

But for the discretion of the proconsul , he was not awed or flabbergasted by the charges (Tajra , 1989The issue chiefly rested in the ambit of the Hebrew Law , and not the offense of any Roman law (Tajra , 1989 . The immediate kindling of the charges against Paul may have caulescent not from the absence of any criminal instance in Paul s do , as the apostle expounded in his defense before the Roman governor Felix (Acts 24 : 11-12 (Bible Gateway 2008 . One may assume that the proconsul had an acuate hatred of the Jews , a view that he shared with his comrade , noted philosopher Seneca (Reisner , 1998 . But in this viewing , the proconsul does recognize some(prenominal) of the Jew s points (Reisner , 1998The proconsul does recognize the legitimacy of the Jew s right to practice their beliefs , or religio legitima , just does not share in the sanctioning of the apostle and horizontal is neutral to attacks of the Jews on their own people because of these religious practices (Reisner 1998 . also , the proconsul , in acquitting Paul , recognized that the law that was being cited in indicting Paul was...If you want to get a full essay, entrap it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay